The whole scene would seem different. You have everybody using the same builds and Nba 2k21 Mt spamming the same moves because somebody else told them to. If everyone had to find their own animations and builds it'd nevertheless essentially look the same because some animations and assembles are just better than others. And also the people with the assembles that are better would win. The meta is the meta name for a reason. Folks don't use two-way slashing playmakers since youtubers told them to. They use them because It's the most OP construct in NBA 2K21. I've never lose to someone using a small ball or a ball hawk.

I've heard that comeback earlier. Bottom line is, the neighborhood is full of followers who have to be told what to do. That is just details. I am glad you mentioned two manner slashing plays since nobody was making those at launch which sort of proves my point. People didnt just"stumble" to that build, they got told by Youtube and it spread through the community. People would find out the most OP builds whether youtube was something. You can go to any point, and take the builds of whoever is on the highest streak. I found out about my current build because I saw some high rep going crazy on it in the ante-up and assessed his player card. Back in 16 I discovered about the demigod 6'7 outside with no youtube video.

This is somewhat true. That is why I want archetypes removed because everyone only makes the most broken and simple to abuse builds. If everyone had the same build it would only be who's better on the sticks. But then it's the same thing with no variety. Everyone is the exact same, nobody would ever pick a big because everyone can rebound and dunk, the entire reason for archetype builds is that you have selection, strengths and flaws. Yes there are a couple builds that CAN do everything, but they are not Great at anything. You want to be a pure sharp or pure slasher, yeah you will score a ton but you are swiss cheese on protection.

You can't actually score that much. Hybrid builds (2-way slashing playmaker that a ) are good yes but they also aren't super consistently good at anything, because their attributes are so spread out. If everyone ran the exact same thing it'd be pointless to select anything but a PG. Since they'd be better at rebounding, inside scoring, and interior protection Individuals would still large bigs. 2 way slashing playmaker can do everything and is good at 3 points. Has lockdown protection, 90+ driving dunk and all contacts, and fast as fuck with 99 rate and vert and 90+ chunk control. Offensive threat is ordinary but great at EVERYTHING on offense.

And what do you mean locks that are pure can't score? Mine can shoot out lights in the corner, has all touch dunks, dribble moves that are pro, and on top of the best defense from any construct. Everyone DOES run precisely the thing. Playlocks or playlock and rebounding wing. Or the occasional large and playshot, which is more rare. And in 2K20 it kind of is moot to be anything but a guard, why would I make a slow center when my lockdown can guard centers AND guards, while being better at everything. No archetypes would not make centers worse. Make bigs better inside and Buy mt nba 2k21 stonger having the capability to body guards.